So it's only my opinion, but in my book, content is content. I've seen people craft posts as large as the Encyclopedia Britannica and as small as a two-word fart joke. At the end of the day, it's up to members what they vote on. You might think something's brilliant that I think is a load of old junk; in my mind, that's what the voting mechanism is about, and yet it would seem there are elements of the community who think EVERYTHING should be perfect, so—how do you know what's good if you have nothing bad to benchmark against? Also, is downvoting a weapon then? That's why "Like" and "Dislike" are way better.