“In the room, filled with about 100 experts and media who closely track the sector, about two-thirds of participants raised their hand to express distrust at the upstart currency.”This came from ChannelNewsAsia where they reported that Facebook’s Libra is under fire for its questionable existence. Facebook recently announced Calibra, it’s financial subsidiary service. And Calibra will introduce its own digital wallet where people can put Facebook’s own version of a digital asset called Libra. They expect to launch by 2020. And it’s received some interesting feedback from authorities, crypto skeptics and enthusiasts alike.
First, a cryptocurrency functions on a decentralized platform we call “blockchain”. While Libra uses blockchain, it functions otherwise. It will be overseen by major companies alongside Facebook. This includes Ebay, Spotify, Paypal. Mostly major companies who have their own audience. Although Facebook did promise to move into a decentralized platform in the future, how and when isn’t necessarily clear. But for now, Libra will have a collective central authority to carry on its transactions.
Second, the Libra token isn’t really considered cryptocurrency. The only similarity Libra has with other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, is it’s based on blockchain. But Libra’s wasn’t built on the same mathematics or protocols with other crypto. Libra’s value is determined by a collective fiat. So basically, it’s value is based on the value of traditional fiat. And this would make Libra a token representation of it, and not cryptocurrency itself.
While some would see it as a stablecoin like Tether, stablecoins are pegged to a real world asset. Noelle Achenson from CoinDesk describes Libra as “a basket of bank deposits and short-term government securities” with an emphasis on government securities. This premise made her define Libra as an ETF (exchange-traded fund) rather than a stablecoin.
When asked in a survey if people would invest into Libra, 18% said yes. That means interest is relatively high. Considering 91% of respondents said they have never invested in crypto. If it’s any indicator, Libra can be a big step towards mainstream use that cryptocurrency and blockchain has been looking for.
With the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the form of digital assets, and the control of major companies, some experts state that Libra may not really introduce cryptocurrency to the masses. But instead, it will just reform whatever system we now. Just, digitalized.
In an article published in TheGuardian, US Congress had this to say:
“The scant information provided about the intent, roles, potential use, and security of the Libra and Calibra exposes the massive scale of the risks and the lack of clear regulatory protections. If products and services like these are left improperly regulated and without sufficient oversight, they could pose systemic risks that endanger US and global financial stability.”While some experts say that Libra will force the government to give a definitive regulation for cryptocurrency, authorities and skeptics are weighing in the possible outcomes if this project fails. Not only does the past catch up with Libra, but should this project fail, it could totally repel any interest in crypto or blockchain in the future.
And since wallets will store data, this means Facebook will not store data. Lead developer David Marcus had this to say regarding the issue:
“The Libra Association will work with policymakers and regulators to make sure this new ecosystem is a value-add to economies, that consumers are protected, and that the role of government oversight and central banks is appropriate. The Association is fully committed to advancing the global dialogue on how blockchain and cryptoassets should be regulated.”
If you’re interested in updates regarding Libra, cryptocurrency, or blockchain, check out our website. You can also contact us for any inquiries regarding cryptocurrency and blockchain.
