This diagram limits space where "truth" applies. Quadrants in the second pic have levels describing areas in the first one.

And seeing that "objective" truth from the perspective of different levels of mind narrows the space of truth even further.

And how would this perspective (which is sort of scientific but not always might be true) be assessed by an algorithm?

What I meant, in general, is that truth is so narrow, the task gets complicated beyond applicability. It can't be apolitical. Misunderstandings and using an algorithm outside of its scope of usability might cause more damage than good.

This is just an opinion :)