Here, here!
Really appreciate this breakdown of the nuances involved with conspiracy, conspiracy theories and anti-conspiracy theories. It's all too easy to label and dismiss dissenting opinions or groups of people as "quacks" and "you people" while not providing any evidence in support - while supporting the prevailing opinions of the majority.

It's certainly the case that it often takes decades for vital information to come to light that supports certain conspiracy theories. Unfortunately, when significant evidence does surface it is often ignored or dismissed. Oftentimes, those arguing from the majority do not deem it worthy of revisiting or reexamining. In other cases, the majority position shifts and it is pooh-poohed, "yes, of course X did Z get over it, move on!" without really addressing the implications of, say, government involvement in criminal activity, war crimes or corruption.

This post relates closely with our research contest for #deepdives 19 "Confirmed Conspiracy Theories". We'll cross-post this article to the community as it is a valuable contribution. Thank you!