If you truly believe that Husley / Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks study is seriously flawed it pales in comparison to the official version of the WTC building 7 collapse produced by the NIST which is patently nonsensical and glaringly incomplete.
"absolute rubbish"
What the NIST did was to produce a “collapse initiation sequence”. They failed to explain the actual dynamics of the collapse. So what they provided ultimately was a sequence that led up to what they proposed was an inevitable collapse of each building.
The data used to create the official NIST WTC7 collapse model is, surprise, surprise - "classified".
Concerning the 'thermite theory', it can neither be proven nor disproven because of the wholesale destruction of evidence from ground zero. The rubble from the twin towers were hurriedly shipped out of the country and sent to scrap yards in China and India before any significant, rigorous and scientific investigation could be conducted. The crime scene quickly covered up.
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/groundzero/china_baosteel.htm
You probably believe in your own unicorns regarding 9/11 such as when the indestructible passport of one of the hijackers, Satam al Suqami, was discovered, completely intact by a 'passerby' a few blocks from the World Trade Center. The black boxes were never retrieved.
https://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/911_TerrTrav_Ch2.pdf
RE: Deep Dives 19 | Confirmed Conspiracy Theories | 200 HIVE in Prizes