I respectfully object, providing informal conjecture as to why such things as angular force in signals seem to be incorrectly associated with "gravitational" events.
Cited from Wikipedia "It is impossible to make magnetic monopoles from a bar magnet. If a bar magnet is cut in half, it is not the case that one half has the north pole and the other half has the south pole. Instead, each piece has its own north and south poles. A magnetic monopole cannot be created from normal matter such as atoms and electrons, but would instead be a new elementary particle.". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole
Impossible? ..new elementary particle? ..non-cyclic field can also be emitted by an electrode and power-supply. Canada possesses such a device with patent pending since 2016, it is given to initiative that I provide calculation for forces complementing that of the macroscopic field about the Earth for a given object's mass.
Quantized formulaic expressions of Macroscopic and Picoscopic non-cyclic fields.
Force of field at point x,y,r = Source charge in eV ÷ quanta of Planck units (distance from source).
Macroscopic field charge received from the Sun = Planetary conduit charge store + Attraction force (archaic: gravity).
The Earth is a conduit (conductor) of charge emitted by the Hydrogen star (Sun) supplying the force which performs the W, work of G, "gravity".
..or we can continue with "it is the mass of Hydrogen that yields gravity upon Earth."
While it is true the Sun is much larger than it's satellites, I like the charge based emission of field as it reflects the behaviour of other systems. Again, the mass of Hydrogen being the driving force yielding gravity is beginning to seem incorrect.
It is inverted and corrected when... we notice that neutrons possess two of the heavier down quarks (yellow) and one light-weight though more convergently charged up quark (red). Therefore Hydrogen that is missing a neutron contains only a proton, a bias of convergent charge due to the two up quarks (red) and only one heavier down quark (yellow).
Venturing forth while implementing/improvising nomenclature that best describes... Infra-red frequencies are emitted by slower convergently charged particles at the nucleus of an atom. Ultra-violet light is emitted by divergently charged particles in relation to the convergent charge bias. Where Hydrogen that is missing a neutron contains more convergent charge and less "mass" (force of non-cyclic macroscopic field interferent upon an elementary particle).
All of these aspects prompt one to wonder, what a point along the orbit of the Earth closest and farthest from the sun with a vector drawn through both extreme eccentricities and the Sun itself ..this vector would suggest a significant source of macroscopic field outside of our solar system. The imaginary vector through eccentricities should point directly toward a source.
Dr. Richard Feynman's assessment of the mathematics employed to express eccentric orbits since Sir Isaac Newton.
IF convergent field theorem = true... the same 0 Hz field expressed both from within and outside the solar system might repel the Sun while attracting the Sun's satellites toward the eccentric orbit states.
..this would suggest our solar system is entering/resisting a convergent system of proportions determined by each of the macroscopic field sources in space.
Convergent(+) (cross >< over point) Divergent(-)
Crossover, when bias of the convergent/divergent forces ratio = 0
A median-point within a conductor belonging to a thermodynamic system ..that would make space a conductor (conduit).
The source of macroscopic field outside the solar system can accurately express the physics necessary for the Sun's satellites to all be sharing the same orbital plane ..this should only happen in a vortecial configuration. Satellites would otherwise be free to orbit the Sun in any direction the way they do about the Earth.
No two stars being equal, neither are the macroscopic fields they express. Therefore one source of 0 Hz field will always be more influent than others creating conditions that provide influence generating a shared orbital plane for a solar system.
The fission and fusion reactions of the Sun are expressing a macroscopic field which is complementary to that emanating from the center/core of the Earth.
WHAT!? ..how amazing! ..the core of the Earth is a scorching hot conduit of macroscopic field charge (0 Hz).
Might volcanic eruption be the earliest iteration of the solar flare? ..hmm.
Refuse is placed inside the fission can. Particles disintegrated to available energy can be output as fusion, forming "new garbage".
All of the convergences of particles, made by natural or human means are eventually "recycled" by processes inherent to our known universe.
It will probably not be anymore of a scare to humans than the microwave or other devices that have urban myths about their safety and potential abuses.
Lunar and other landings should no longer be impossible to prepare, increasing the probability of preventing the existing trend of "possibly" macroscopic field induced crash-landings.
OML ..G-force is the induction of 0 Hz field during motion, through quanta of Planck lengths.
Strange, some of the destructive "gravitational" behavior described by Blackhole theorists is finding it's more logical application to Hydrogen stars like the Sun.
