As I mentioned in my previous post, another batch of Pfizer vaccine papers is available from Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. In addition to the fact that Pfizer's COVID vaccine was not 95% effective as they claimed, given that the unmanipulated data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate, there are other interesting revelations.
One of the documents released was the "Prescription Drug User Fee Payment" that BioNTech paid to the FDA on 20/04/2021 for the "COMIRNATY COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine" which FDA subsequently approved in August 2021. This prescription drug user commission payment amounted to $ 2,875,842.00. Guess what could decide FDA about the vaccine approval after this transfer?
Less than 6.6% of patients undergoing trials are counted. Where did the data for the hundreds of other test subjects go?
In the documents, there are a few Case Report Forms (CRFs) listed for specific sites where clinical trials were conducted.
Jessica Rose did a huge data analitics (i leave the full link of her in the references) and it turns out is that there are hundreds ID numbers of subjects missing if we assume that each participant actually has a CRF written as it should be. The percentages of subjects actually accounted for are all less than 6.6%. In the case of the Ventavia Research Group for site 1085, only 1.4% of the subjects are represented. If these are the complete lists of subjects, then where did the data for the hundreds of other subjects go?
It was meant to be single, external, independent and expert advisory group set up to oversee the safety and efficacy data of the vaccination program. But Pfizer is in charge and BioNTech has funded it. FDA did nothing. The members of the "External Data Monitoring Committee" who were apparently chosen by Pfizer, monitored by Pfizer.
References:
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/this-took-all-day-and-it-is-worth?s=rSource image
