You edited your message, I answered a lot of it above. But here's and additional answer:

1. you are viewing the bank's assets as a third party where you will not see any economic benefit (you only get to instruct them on how to spend their money).

2. I would argue the DAO is part of your personal assets because the value of the DAO will be embedded in the price of your SPS.

SPS has at most 3 billion issued (less now after nodes/RFW packs). The DAO already owns 300 million SPS (+ what comes in from nodes/RFW packs). That's 10%+ already, not counting past and future sales of nodes/RFW packs.

If the DAO gets another 200 million SPS just from RFW sales, then it will be over 500m SPS. That's the numerator.

For the denominator, in addition to the DAO holding say 500m of the 3B in SPS or 16.6%; the whole flywheel model Matt is implementing is designed to BURN SPS.

Example A:

500m
_____ = 16.6%
3b

Every year they will issue more things to be sold in DEC. That DEC will have to come from burning SPS. So each year the denominator will go down, but our numerator will stay the same or go up with earnings.

Lets say they sell just one mini set per year along the lines of RFW... 3 million packs at $5 each. That's $15m worth of DEC or 300m burned SPS at an average of 5c. So now the equation looks like this:

Example B:

500m
_____ = 18.5%
2.7b

Rinse and repeat each year. Also don't forget to include all the DEC that will be needed for other things too.

How does this affect each staked SPS holder?

There are 3 ways:

1. the % of each player's outstanding stake will increase just like the DAO's listed above.
2. the DAO should be the strongest holder of SPS, thus effectively taking their SPS off the market since they in theory should be the last seller.
3. the DAO could vote to give things like dividends, asset distributions, or other value enhancing perks to SPS holders in the future.

NOTE on #3: while this is nowhere close to even being on the radar, the point is the assets are OWNED by the staked SPS holders and can be distributed however the community of SPS stakeholders votes. Obviously collectively we would all decide what is the best thing to do, and the same voting rules would apply so it would have to be more than a majority to make this type of decision.

Hope this helps you to understand my thinking.