davegudeman

"and in 2000 years the things that we thought were real will be laughed at" That's my point. The engineering won't be laughed at; the science will. We don't laugh today at Greek siege engines

Telling a lie repeatedly doesn't make it the truth. There are lots of real images.

Here is my refutation of all of your points with one statement: in any conflict between science and engineering, the engineering is right and the science is wrong.

There are millions of such images.

Of the first ten "proof", seven or eight were based on the fallacy of begging the question. A large structure is described as if it were built on a flat surface and then it is pointed out that

No one imagines that they don't have to care about the past if they want to learn how to build an engine or an airplane, cure a case of tuberculosis or create a fine whiskey. In areas where the results

Cool stuff, but the room is filled with high-power EM radiation and I don't think the potential long-term health effects have been explored thoroughly enough yet.

No, it was based on the absolutist relativism of the entire post. Look, I don't want to be offensive here, but you clearly have some talent in this so I think it's worth telling you about something that

That link is included in the article itself. I wrote the original.

"There is no absolute" cannot possibly be true because if there were no absolute, then "there is no absolute" would be an absolute. You are promoting an ancient and well-worn false

You should come up with a cool name for this new energy drink. How about lemonade? :)

Thanks. This is a topic that has tasked me for some time and I've finally decided to write about it.