"The Nuremberg Tribunals were a precedent and a promise. As part of the universal determination to avoid the scourge of war, legal precedents were created that outlawed wars of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The implied promise held forth to the world was that such crimes would be condemned in the future wherever they occurred and that no person or nation would be above the law. After half a century, it now seems possible that the promise may yet be fulfilled."
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/46711856.pdf
I just got banned for a week for posting this next part. This ^ is still there. Perhaps I should have expected this, but the author of the post was asking for information that would be helpful. I guess I won't be getting my livestreaming back in 2021. I don't really care about that anymore though.
Information can cause physical harm? Like the physical harm that will take place when someone is coerced into taking an experimental medical procedure that has not been proven safe nor effective? As you can see, they are clearly AFRAID and UNINFORMED, and yet are being coerced and bribed.
I am on the verge of taking the V for my job, they offer $1K incentive to take it and I have until tomorrow to decide or I leave my job to go back home for the last time. I need to provide for myself and I need to keep my home, I am honestly full of anxiety and fear about taking it because I don’t know the long term affects of the V yet. I don’t care about the money.. I care about my health, I know it’s a personal choice and it shouldn’t be forced on anyone, however if somebody can provide me links on more research done about the vaccine so I can further educate myself more on this before making a decision that would be helpful! I really wish I could keep my job! I am very stressed, confused and conflicted 😐 Time is ticking"
Perhaps I could have commented something else, but I was reading The Legacy of Neuremberg so it seemed relevant at the time. I guess the lesson here is, shut up and take the jab!! Right?
Text was copied from https://awakenny.wordpress.com/2021/05/10/nuremberg-trials-2021/
The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.
The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:
Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene-therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.
Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.
Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.
Reduces circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
Reduces transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
https://main.nojabforme.info/#one
Many people still do not understand history.
Twenty-four major political and military leaders of Nazi Germany, indicted for aggressive war, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, were brought to trial before the International Military Tribunal. More than 100 additional defendants, representing many sectors of German society, were tried before the United States Nuremberg Military Tribunals in a series of 12 trials known as “Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings.” The four major publications linked below contain: the official proceedings of the trial of the major war criminals (The Blue Series), documentary evidence and guide materials from that trial (The Red Series), the official condensed record of the subsequent trials (The Green Series), and a final report on all the war crimes trials held in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1949.
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Nuremberg_trials.html
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical
experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds,
conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such
experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other
methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests
upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is
a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with
impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of
society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random
and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other
problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the
experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to
believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those
experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to
protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury,
disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.
The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of
the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to
bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state
where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared
to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe,
in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required
of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury,
disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_final-report.pdf
It is not for me to decide what the consequences will be, but at this point it is abundantly clear that the experiment must be stopped immediately, and all those continuing to extort, bribe and coerce individuals to participate in these emergency use authorized human trials must stop doing so.
If you have made a personal choice, fully informed of risks to take a medical procedure, I have no problem with your choice. I have a big problem with people being deceived and coerced.
I was taught every year in school this is probably the worst thing that could possibly happen.
Every year it was bashed into my brain that we must NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN AGAIN.
And yet, how quickly people forget when they have been threatened by their government, and had their livelihoods taken away. They are desperate to do anything to "get back to normal" so are coerced into taking the "solution".
More reading, The Law of the Nuremberg Trial by Quincy Wright
The American Journal of International Law
Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 1947), pp. 38-72 (35 pages)
Published By: Cambridge University Press
Download this Notice Of Liability for your Employer.
The Clinical Trials, technically, are currently underway and won't end until October 27, 2022 for Moderna, and July 30, 2023 for Pfizer. Humans are the guinea pigs. The notion that a jab can be approved as safe under these set of circumstances should ring the alarm bells of every District Attorney and Attorney General, who is not compromised.
https://main.nojabforme.info/#one
