This Is The "Skolae Plan", Children's Indoctrination Plan

The state, faithful to its principles has always sought and will seek new ways to exercise control over society, for some reason in recent times these attempts have become much more recurrent and much more evident, not only do I speak of an extremely centralized government with an extremely closed economy, not only do I speak of dictatorships that forcefully seek to subdue their citizens, I speak of constant attempts to alter the social structure either by changing education or the culture itself... The aim of this is no more than to obtain future voters on the basis of a totally biased education, whether it is directly in favour of a political agenda or indirectly through the support of various ideologies that support or are part of a sector of the political spectrum.

When we talk about indoctrination, we take into account above all the religious, the moral and the political, all this is wrong on the basis that every parent has the right to educate their children the way they want because the personal is not political and the state has no right to get involved in such education, common sense also tells us that any act of indoctrination towards a child, because of how influential they are is an abuse due to the possible "incidences" that this may cause in the future, especially if we talk about the famous development of critical thinking... But in the end, the state has always liked that citizens are the equivalent of a robot and that is why the educational system is the disaster that it is.

Any act of indoctrination to last in society is especially efficient to perform on children, because it is much easier than indoctrinating an adult for obvious reasons and it is relatively simpler to achieve "radicalization" in some sense, added to the fact that they are young and therefore will be the present and future of society... The government of Navarra in Spain has carried out a plan of child indoctrination called "Skolae" in favor of the progressive agenda, here the problem is not the title of the program nor the content itself, although many of them are quite debatable for purely scientific reasons, the problem is that the state is forcing a type of education with the excuse of helping and supporting the marginalized, in this case the LGBT movement and Third Wave Feminism, directly attacking parental rights. The other problem of course is that it is extremely delicate to talk about an issue such as sexuality and to set moral terms about it to young children, which in fact should not be done since sexual education should be based solely on the prevention of disease, unwanted pregnancies and knowledge of contraceptive methods... Not about moral terms or sexual values that would encompass what is right, what is wrong and why.

SKOLAE is articulated around diverse concepts that cross the entire itinerary; the prevention of violence against women and girls, the visibility of women and their contributions, respect for identities, cultures, sexualities and their diversity, social participation and the shared commitment to make equality a reality.

The fact is that this plan will be mandatory in all schools in Navarra, which oviously generated controversy over the authoritarian measure and content of the plan, the Document is in Spanish, however you can use a translator to read it complete if you want, also during this post I will be making references to some of the many measures that the implementers of the plan have planned to carry out in children for a correct process of indoctrination...

Faced with the mirage of equality in which a certain part of society has settled, educational centres are an essential (although insufficient) reference for detecting the persistence of some sexist inequalities and their causes, the appearance of other different ones and the achievement of some advances in Equality. In themselves, they must be coeducational spaces and free of sexism. The coeducational practice must make us competent both for the critical diagnosis of reality, from a well-founded gender approach, and for the design of our involvement in building new egalitarian identities, male and female, which are demanded and demanded a coexistence in equality and are involved in building a society in which equality is a reality. and not a vindication... According to CEDAW, States Parties are not only obliged to lay the legal foundations for formal equality between women and men; it is necessary to ensure that there is equality of outcome or de facto: substantive equality. Substantive equality involves changing the circumstances that prevent people from fully exercising their rights and having access to development opportunities through structural, legal or public policy measures.

Although some points that this plan seeks to address may result in something positive for society if they are well taken care of, unfortunately these elements are part of a certain political activism. No one can say that they are in favor of gender violence for example, the problem is when this is used to say "this plan seeks to prevent gender violence and promote tolerance" when really the intention is to generate an excuse to generate an intrusion into the education of children using as disguises concepts socially accepted as positive and that in the end hide very concrete political doctrines... An example of this is when we realize that one of their objectives is the search for equality of results, not of opportunities and the clear references to the "inequalities" for merely sexist reasons that exist between the two sexes... Something that in itself is not an issue that should be dealt with by children because it has no educational basis.

The itinerary serves for the progressive acquisition of basic skills that will allow girls and boys to choose, build and live their own life project from the knowledge, freedom and ability to decide on their future without gender conditions, learning to identify inequalities, to fight against them and to exercise their right to equality in the field of their culture, religion, social class, functional situation, etc.

The goal of this program is not really to educate, it is in fact, to create activists who seek to fight against inequalities on the basis that they have been previously indoctrinated in the pursuit of equal outcomes... That is to say, they will be people who seek, fight and protest to achieve a kind of equality impossible to obtain by human beings, by the simple fact that if you have a group A of certain characteristics and a group B of other characteristics, when making them perform a set of tasks the results will always be varied, so there will never be equality of results, nor cultural and social because all this varies because we are unique and different beings, this can be only achieved by force because we are not clones... Of course, once again you delve into the supposed objectives of this pamphlet what you find is the "mission" of denaturalizing Heterosexuality by making children think that they are heterosexual by simple systematic pressure... Or the fact that they seek to make believe that women are treated as objects of desire or of service because of the man who enjoys innumerable privileges, making clear reference to Karl Marx's "Class Struggle" but in this case extrapolated to the "Gender Struggle", the fact of putting women against men by the logic of "you don't have X thing because he has it", all this creates a scenario where objectively one doesn't want to obtain "more rights" for women through effort and competition, but rather "take away rights" from men through force and governmental power to generate "equity".

It is necessary to reflect on the multi-causal nature of social phenomena and, as is evident, also of gender inequality. Angela Davis, for example, elaborates the concept of intersectionality in order to "understand the categories of race, gender and class as connected, intertwined and intertwined elements". It is necessary to make visible the diverse categories that generate and reproduce inequality: race, gender, class, ethnicity or culture. The environment of the educational action is characterized by a progressive multiculturalism. The coeducative action must be a space to be aware of the different cultural variants of the sex-gender system. It is necessary to jointly know and analyze its implications in the society in which we live.

Here again we can observe the indoctrination in favor of multiculturalism, based on the fact that "all cultures are worth the same", "there are no better cultures than the others", "we are all equal", despite the fact that science, history and common sense dictate absolutely the opposite, there are cultures that are evidently richer than others, there are cultures that are in themselves better than others and therefore have the societies that they have, the rights, morality and values that they preserve... And of course, human beings are different, especially depending on the place in the world where you are born, race, gender, religion... And this is something that documents science in multiple aspects. However, it is important to emphasize that this is an excellent method to make children not worry in the least about preserving their culture since they will have been indoctrinated in the thought that "Multiculturalism is good" when today we can see the problems it has.

The coeducational school must be able to identify and value the egalitarian achievements made in our environment by feminist movements and equality policies; it must also be able to propose new achievements that are still pending. From the co-educational commitment for a more egalitarian world, egalitarian identities must be promoted, diverse but committed to the exercise of the right to equality in both public and private spheres.

If you still didn't believe that this "educational plan" was just an excuse to indoctrinate children and young minds on the basis of a political agenda and authoritarian movements with a certain ideology, I think it removes any kind of doubt... It is truly disgusting to see how "explicit" they are when it comes to demonstrating that they have as their objective the forced indoctrination of people on the basis of the ideologies of a movement that in itself generates rejection by a large part of the population due to its radicality, methods and lack of logical and empirically demonstrable arguments. It is also alarming to bear in mind that they seek to promote such ideas in "public and private" aspects, and I say this because the private is a fundamental part of the freedom of the individual... The plan seeks to make children see ideological currents and movements as something absolute and unequivocal that deserve unconditional respect for so "necessary" social work, which makes me think, this type of education is in favor and practically forces people to accept and normalize all kinds of diversity except the diversity of ideas, which personally, I consider the most important thing that a human being has beyond everything else.

It is especially important to ensure that inequality is seen as a social problem, not as a women's problem, nor as a strictly individual problem. Students should be incorporated as subjects of the coeducational action, so that they question their masculinity, challenge its relations with violence against women, and get to know other egalitarian masculinities, masculinities that feel committed and comfortable in models of coexistence with empowered women, just as free as men. Methodological research should be strengthened to ensure that all students, not only those previously sensitized to Equality, question the concept of hegemonic masculinity and subject to criticism the privileges of those they enjoy.

They say with absolute clarity that children should be incorporated as members of the "coeducational action"... It is understood as activism or future activism, and introduces the idea to boys that they have to question their masculinity, because according to this plan is something inherently negative for various reasons, which will probably make them have feelings of guilt and consequently lower self-esteem, questioning their own values and morals and even questioning their own sexuality that they have not even been able to explore because they are children and these abusers seek to alter the natural search process of a person by implanting deeply arbitrary ideas with the aim of "changing a society" by creating clones that think exactly the same thing...

And it is here where the alarms that we have in our heads sound because it turns out that one of the activities that children between 0 and 6 years old must carry out is the execution of "erotic games"... Yes, erotic games, here is the news, this added to all the above mentioned and everything else that I did not mention because the document is quite extensive and my somewhat limited time I could not mention ... This invites to think about a possible next search for the normalization of Pedophilia... It is easy to make a puzzle, if you seek to normalize the sexualization of children and at the same time applaud everything that has to do with sexual diversity and the multiple orientations that can be... I would not be at all surprised by the search for the legalization of paedophilia under the argument that it is an "orientation more" and children are sexual beings... Think wrong and you will be right.

With this I hope that this attempt of indoctrination and abuse of minors by the state and ideological activists has become evident, this is only a case of a place in the world, as there can be tens, even hundreds, we have to become aware of them in order to avoid them and thus protect the most valuable thing that a society has ... If we let these kinds of ideas continue to take away freedoms and rights from parents and children we will soon have an easily controllable society where being different will be a real crime. Thank you for reading... Peace

#	References
1	SKOLAE Erotic Games