Beneficiaries can be used for two other important purposes; funding the Steem.DAO and reducing the token supply. Because the Steem.DAO is technically just an account on Steem, by setting @steem.dao as

Crypto basic income also is something I blogged about, and others, way back in 2014. Things 5 years later are reaching a point where it's actually plausible and Facebook Libra honestly could be used to

On the topic of Andrew Yang, the stuff Yang is saying is stuff I said from the beginning here on Steem and in other circles. I've always been a supporter of what I call "Citizen's Income" and

Just so you know, I've spread your video around to my friends and colleagues. Your videos are good and particular the last one where you had the brilliant marketing funnel idea. Political campaigns should

It's time to direct resources and brain power toward coming up with business models and strategies to reduce supply and create demand for Steem.

I'm asking for a way to measure and track your progress. How do we know the funding is resulting in improving the utility of Steem? Are Steem going to be locked up? Burned? It's hard to measure something

I don't follow that more people = higher price. Facebook didn't start out monetized. They created an advertising mechanism which monetized their people. Do you have a plan for highly targeted advertising?

Marketing = revenue generation. Create a reason for Steem to be burned, locked up, and purchased.

I like this idea because in your proposal you stress the intent to increase revenue for Steem and bring that revenue to the Steem ecosystem. Can you provide a bit more detail about that? For now I'll upvote

Nice idea but tell us how this idea will raise the price of Steem or produce revenue for those who upvote or delegate Steem Power to fund it? Revenue sharing or revenue generation is important. Profitability

Anyone have some ideas on supply sinks which projects can use to lock up Steem or burn Steem as a means to increase scarcity and by that increase the value of Steem?

We need to make revenue generation a priority. Cost reduction only goes so far.

And then we have to look at the cost vs the benefit. If the proposal is very cheap then yes I can say maybe. The cost being less than 4k SBD is actually pretty good so I can get behind it but we do need

Well here is my issue and maybe I'm the only one saying it, but we need a way to estimate how much each proposal could benefit the price of Steem. We all know cutting costs (increasing efficiency) is good

This is good news, but better would be if we had a plan to actually raise the value of Steem. So far they are cutting costs but not increasing the price of Steem. Cutting costs stop the bleeding at least

I said this before and I know this isn't likely to be implemented but we need a section in the UI which lists a projected return on investment or revenue generated from each proposal. If it's zero then

On the topic of whales, I used to be a large dolphin (had around 40,000+ Steem at one point) but the problem is, I had to pay the cost of living and over time sold what I had. The good thing about it is

I formally welcome you to join the Tauchain Telegram if you have the time. The brain power of an economist and mechanism design expert such as yourself could be appreciated by such an ambitious project.

Sometimes the only thing which I can do is take a nap. Sometimes a full 7 hour block of sleep isn't going to work because my body wakes up but it is important to simply keep trying to nap getting an hour

I like your work. You do a good job explaining economic to the masses in a way where it's practical and you supply all the necessary formulas and algorithms too.