It is certainly true that each chapter could be expanded into a book on its own.

I state that the end doesn't justify the means, but apparently you believe it does.

I state that tyranny aims to prevent people from changing the system and reaching a new consensus and you "LOL", presumably you believe that a tyranny would never attempt to prevent people from replacing the system.

You suggest that people should not have the right to secede, which implies a desire to dominate. I get it, under the law of the jungle if you can prevent others from "leaving" you make yourself stronger. But I argue that you no longer have democracy or consent of the governed.