@dan, @doingitright, @highsteam1900, @cryptokens, @merivercap

@dan, @fractallymike, @val, @daodejing, @cryptokens, @recentchats

@dan, @mattlangston, @thomashallgren, @nudimar, @merivercap

@dan, @dphillippi, @lionflash, @jamesmart, @westreich, @zeos

@dan, @doingitright, @jamesmart, @daodejing, @bishop3dcrea, @berliangor

@dan, @doingitright, @pnc, @stan, @timless, @norsegaud

Speculation can be supported by contract for difference without artificially locking up real resources.

Costs are based on the % utilization and all else being equal a rise in token value is a rise in price of resources, but if that results in a fall of demand for transactions then resource prices will fall.

Current resource abuse mitigation systems are the cause of bad user experience.

Thanks for this effort, I look forward to seeing how this turns out.

Rule by force is a symptom of the masses collective desire to rule by force. We must move past end justifies the means thinking.

I’m glad to see this for bitshares.

See my blog post where I outline how to measure group values and provide a critique to the methods described in this post:

Approve

@dan, @lionflash, @jseymour, @dansingjoy, @jaytaylor-node, @maximcincinnatis

Some very solid thinking in this post. I would add that the reason for the time limits has more to do with the accumulation of storage costs as well as attempting to prevent abuse by having the whole community

@dan, @wildwex, @highsteam1900, @bishop3dcrea, @recentchats

Given block height X including transaction with TaPoS reference (R=200), then the referenced block number would be (int(X/4096)-(R-127))*4096 assuming R > 127. If R <= 127 then it would be X - R.

@dan, @lionflash, @marconmaste, @sim31,@aguerrido

@dan, @tmess, @berliangor, @jessethan, @drew-bop