It is certainly true that each chapter could be expanded into a book on its own. I state that the end doesn't justify the means, but apparently you believe it does. I state that tyranny aims to prevent

I appreciate your feedback and look forward to seeing how things change as you read.

I have no idea how you read it that fast. I can’t even read it anywhere near that speed. I’m glad that you enjoyed it.

Absolutely! This book outlines the real problem is a consensus building problem. And "democracy" is supposed to be a means of building consensus. Tyranny opposes any attempt to build a new consensus.

Good tip!

To be honest, I have a lot of catching up to do before I would feel comfortable suggesting priorities. I’m grateful for a community motivated by its own priorities and not waiting on me to solve everything.

What are you talking about?

I don’t understand what you think I said? When did I say I would take anything from someone for what they say?

It requires a token, but I won’t do an ico. It doesn’t have finality (similar to bitcoin). Critically, it shouldn’t require hardforks or governance at the protocol layer.

Off topic