For those who don’t know Balancer is an Uniswap like platform build on Ethereum. An automated market making (AMM) platform. In a lot of ways, it is very similar to Uniswap, but it has its specifics. It is also not the latest copycat as well since it has been around since March 2020, and has been in the making since 2019.
https://balancer.exchange/#/swap
https://pools.balancer.exchange/#/explore
https://pools.vision/
Some of the specifics of Balancer are:
If you are familiar with Uniswap, you know that the standard way to add liquidity in a pool is 50% : 50% share between the tokens. On Balancer this ratio can be different, and anyone can choose as they like when creating a pool. Another thing is the number of assets/tokens in the pool. The standard is two tokens, but on Balancer you can have 3, 4 up to 8 tokens in a pool. The fees on Uniswap are standard 0.3% per swap, while on Balancer they can be also set differently when a pool is created.
You can find more info about Balance here https://docs.balancer.finance/getting-started/faq.
Here is the chart for total value locked on Balancer.
https://defipulse.com/balancer
Just under a 600M at this moment. Not a small amount. At the moment of writing this the Market cap for Balancer is around 150M.
I posted about My experience providing liquidity on Uniswap, now it is time to check Balancer.
A very important thing to mention here before we continue. I entered the 80% BAL – 20% ETH pool. If you read the previous post on providing liquidity and lessons learned from that, you would know that impermanent loss is the biggest risk when providing liquidity. It is almost granted to happen. The only time it won’t happen if both pooled assets are moving in price in the exactly the same manner. This is not the case most of the time.
To avoid impermanent loss as a liquidity provider you can do it by pooling stablecoins or a single asset tokens.
In the case above I’m trying to go for the single asset option, since most of the assets in the pool (80%) is in one token, BAL in this case. The risk that comes with this is the token price. I’m exposed a lot on the movements on the BAL token price. If it goes down Ill lose in assets value.
Another risk when playing around with these things is hacking. Have in mind these are all new things and hacks happens a lot. Actually, Balancer had a hack incident this year already with a so called flash loans.
This said, we won’t learn new things if don’t try them 😊. So here we go.
We will be looking at the following thigs:
Another important thing to add is that Balancer has a liquidity providers incentives program. They are distributing tokens to a liquidity providers in a certain pools. The 80% BAL – 20% ETH pool is one of them. BAL is rewarded weekly and you can claim them each week or leave them to accumulate and claim in one transaction to save on fees.
I have added to my BAL-ETH pool more then once. Here is the history.
| Date | Token | Tokens Amount | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.10.2020 | BAL | 37.667 | 10 | 377 |
| 31.10.2020 | ETH | 0.249 | 384 | 96 |
| 13.11.2020 | BAL | 36.809 | 12.5 | 460 |
| 13.11.2020 | ETH | 0.247 | 469 | 116 |
| 06.12.2020 | BAL | 20.000 | 13.8 | 276 |
| 06.12.2020 | ETH | 0.114 | 598 | 68 |
| 1,392 |
A total of 1392 USD added to the pool, 1113 in BAL and 278 in ETH.
How are things now doing? Here is the table.
| Current Assets Current Price | Token | Tokens Amount | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.12.2020 | BAL | 97.57 | 14.5 | 1,415 |
| 18.12.2020 | ETH | 0.542 | 653 | 354 |
| 1,769 |
Well not bad at all. The value of the assets has increased from 1392 to a 1769. But where does this increase in value comes from? Most of it is from the increase in the tokens price, both BAL and ETH, as we will see below.
This is the reference hypothetical scenario. What would have happened if I didn’t pooled these tokes but just hodl. It is used for calculating the impermanent loss.
| Token | Tokens Amount | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETH | 2.49 | 459.80 | 1,147 |
| UNI | 216.46 | 3.01 | 652 |
| 1,798 |
In summary:
This is basically showing that I would have the same value in dollar terms with and without pooling. Is this the case?
We need to add a few more thing to the numbers above to get the whole picture:
As mentioned, this pool has incentives on top of the fees. Additional BAL is distributed to liquidity providers. Also, I need to separate the fees. Here it is:
When all the above taken into calculation a net of 116 USD. Notice the small amount of fees earned. If the there was no incentives for LPs, the fees alone would not worth it at all. The average APY on those is just a few % per year. But when the incentives are added things change for the better.
Since I have been adding liquidity on few occasions, I can’t calculate all the period above with the total earnings. When I calculate the earnings from the last week alone the APY for the pool is around 76%. The extra BAL tokens included. The https://pools.vision/ tool is showing a 79% APY for this pool.
Overall, this pool has done nice, for now 😊. As already mentioned, I’m going for the single asset scenario in this example, although its not an exactly single, but 80%. With this I’m exposing myself to the risk of the BAL token price fluctuation. The value of the assets in the pool has increased for 376 USD (27%) with almost zero impermanent loss (a miracle 😊) and I have earned a 116 USD on top of it as incentives, or 76% APY.
This said, things could be very different now, if the price of the BAL token dropped in the period. I have been lucky and got an average around 11$ entry price and BAL is now more than 14$. The price of these tokens can vary a lot, and it has been going up and down in the past. If the price dropped just 10% under my entry price, those 100$ incentives would have been eaten up by the loss in the token value. There is always a big risk with these things, no matter how shiny they look at a first glance. Also, the big question is for how long these incentives for liquidity providers will last. Always be aware.
All the best
