To clear the whole situation, the Copyright Office issued a statement describing it's "job" which is basically registrating "claims" :)
It doesn't investigate, certify, or guarantee that the claimant's affirmation is the truth. So, Craig Wright is not recognized by the Copyright Office as Satoshi Nakamoto or anywhere else for that matter.
In fact, it turns out any one can make a similar claim by paying $55 fee and affirming he is Satoshi to the Copyright Office. Anyone can do it!
I just feel bad for whoever joined the hype and pumped $BSV to find themselves with a huge bag very likely to dump anytime now.
Here is the full press release:
May 22, 2019: Questions about Certain Bitcoin Registrations
As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.
A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein. It is possible for multiple, adverse claims to be registered at the Copyright Office. The Copyright Office does not have an opposition procedure for copyright registrations, such as the procedures available at the Patent and Trademark Office for patents and trademark registrations. Disputes over the claims in a registration may be heard before federal courts, including disputes over authorship of a work. Someone who intentionally includes false information in an application may be subject to criminal penalties.
The examination process is primarily focused on determining whether a deposited work is eligible for protection under the Copyright Act and whether the application satisfies the requirements of registration. The Copyright Office will correspond with the claimant to clear up any obvious inconsistencies. The Copyright Office may similarly correspond with a claimant if a deposited work seems to include portions a well-known work whose author is known.
In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author.
In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.
https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop
