If there's one thing I know, and I mean I KNOW, it's that moving shit around and chasing gains based on small sample sizes is the easiest way in the world to get rekt. While your logic may be sound and may even prove right over the next few months, it was also very sound and more well thought out in the weeks prior to this all happening.

My opinion is that having that stablecoin pair where it is is a great incentive for people that don't want the extra market risk of BNB. If the return on BNB and Cub are going to be as great as you say they are, I don't see why you would need to take from the people who don't want that risk to feed the ones who will already be winning big on the BNB as well as the Cub. Sounds like you're trying to have your cake and eat it too.

The fees are 0% on both pools so they're basically interchangeable. You should be able to move back and forth as much as you want. Again, if BNB is going to 4x, you'll have plenty of gains to make up for the small transaction fees you'll incur.

Just my opinion but, like I said, giving higher payouts to the "riskier" pools seems like a kneejerk reaction to a couple green candles.