Well no voting system can be 100% perfect so there would be some little faults in the voting system but i am

certain that the voting system is not corrupted,,the voting system is done manually which means that the

curators of this platform manually checks the question or answer before they decide if it is worth an upvote or if it is not....the issue i have with the voting system is that there are some questions that have many meaningful

answers and none of those answers from people got upvotes meanwhile there are some other questions with many answers and all the answers under the questions

are upvotes and it makes it look like there is no balance on upvotes and that is why is some meaninful answers do not get upvotes while some answers that are even

less meaninful get upvote sometimes...i think the curators should look into this and find a solution to it so that everyone writing good answers can get quality share of the upvotes which they deserve...