Please create an ARCHON proposal for this kind of governance change.

Thank you very much for clarifying how you would have to create a proposal for this type of changes, because the proposal system is so complicated since we have an option called Proposals in the front end, but after all it is only for funds and there is the ARCHON system which is too complex for many users as a script needs to be written and no information about this is fixed or displayed in our community.

At this moment, only you know how to work with this DAO and this style of governance.

As for a response to this proposal I would encourage the community to no vote on this funding proposal and, as written, any goverrnance proposal that may come of it.

It's amazing how we've heard nothing from the @sportstalksocial account for 8 months other than the curation reports made by @cryptoandcoffee, the automated responses to governance proposals and a post asking what SPORTS meant to the community.

But when you start talking about possible profound changes in the community, this account always appears and still tries to somehow influence how people should vote.

I don't know why any stakeholders, beyond those chosen as having a voice, would vote to remove their voice in governace to give a very small group those authorities. However as I've stated if a governance proposal was approved then I would be willing to follow the community requests.

But has this governance model brought us anywhere? Is the community stronger and better than ever? Have things been done to improve?
Well, it seems that the answer to all these questions is no, because we are from the communities with the least interactions even when we are in a year in which we had a World Cup and I think that demonstrates a lot how things are going around here.

But I could also be the one who is wrong and not seeing things as they are.

transfer all private keys of the @patrickulrich community accounts to the core team
transfer the @patrickulrich domain to the core team

Giving as a justification the fact that it is a new team taking care of these matters and trying to give as a negative point the fact that they do not have experience managing a community does not seem to me to be a very valid argument.
It's good that in successful companies new people occupy great positions to help these companies grow, but here it's preferable to stay as we are instead of going after people willing to implement things and try to change things.

This is too broad to respond to but I'd encourage stakeholders to remember that changing tokenomics affects two parties, one positively and another negatively, be sure to have any potential tribe governance be clear on their requests.

When I talk about analyzing the current tokenomics, it would be able to identify how we could solve the problem of having too large a supply, which means that there is always a selling pressure, which will never let the token grow and become an attractive token.
I would never change any more rules regarding tokenomics but for that it would be better to try to start a sports community from scratch where I wouldn't have this problem, because I would do things very differently.

I can save you the time of analyzing anything, this isn't even possible on Hive Engine for tribes on the Hive Engine SMT.

I love the sarcastic tone in the answer but if I remember correctly this was proposed in the past by the current owner. So how was he going to implement this if he now says it's not possible?

We encourage anyone who has ideas for our community logos to post them to chain and seek proposals to be adopted by the community. Artists can also request funding for such designs through our token fund that you've posted this to. Are you saying that your opinion is better than that of the entire community voting on such a matter?

My opinion is not better than anyone else's opinion but instead of waiting for proposals to fall from heaven to deal with some matters I would go after people who I know could help us and maybe even just for the pleasure of helping without having to spend a penny but of course I wouldn't force that person to have to write a script to create a proposal.

We've been open to having this created for a long time. If you have PRs that can enable this functionality we encourage you to push them upstream to the Hive Engine repository so they can deploy them to the community. We would happily vote on any token fund requests to reimburse users for submitting such PRs.

Since you say you already had several ideas, did you ever go looking for people with the necessary knowledge to implement these ideas?
Or do you think they will appear in a sports community from beyond?
If we want to make changes and there is no knowledge in the community, we need to think outside the box and set our feet on the path, as they say in Portugal.

I am happy to see users seeking changes but wish these were presented to advance the tribe versus put the tribe under some kind of control of a small group of users. I encourage anyone who thinks they can improve the tribe to seek doing so with proposals that allow anyone to vote and make their stake in the community heard.

You continue to bang on the DAO issue and I understand that you defend it to the end as otherwise your greatest achievement in the past two years would fall flat.

If there is a great opportunity to implement something that the community even agreed with the idea, but this has an associated cost and has to be answered in a very tight time frame, how do we not let this opportunity slip away? Making proposals at the DAO and waiting for people to vote? What if they are absent and when they vote we no longer have the same proposal in hand?