I share the same opinion that a community that turns out to be in some way a company that should work for its users and cannot be somewhat decentralized because there are issues that cannot wait indefinitely to decide.
Undoubtedly, LeoFinance is an excellent example where having a team makes it possible to take important decisions, bringing developments to the community.
I can share that the first thing I thought of was creating a community from scratch without having the SPS history, but I think it is still possible for us to continue with the same community and manage to evolve from now on, even if this requires time and determination from the people who stand in front of the community.
My thinking is that by continuing with our community, this will be a marathon and not a sprint, but it doesn't take away from me trying to do something to make it grow.
That's why I decided to create a proposal in the community and understand what the community's will is.
RE: SportsTalkSocial community: Overview