Some of them are what I was thinking that it could/should be implemented and it would/will be discussed with the discussion group that had mentioned they would be implemented.
However, even before we had the DAO implemented, I never saw the owner of the community with the initiative to do something and always be in a position waiting for others to think of suggestions or improvements for him, I don't feel good about myself doing the work all for him.
When a person decides to create a community, he must think about the future of it, from how to keep people interested, how will it captivate more people, etc.
Another issue is that this DAO model that is currently implemented does not seem to be at all beneficial since only one person knows how to use it and no one else has tried to use it.
But from what I've understood these past two years, maybe I'm wrong, after all I was the only one to raise questions about community management, it seems that the current state of it is satisfactory for most holders.
RE: Sports Talk Social: The Community's Future