No, I am not missing the point.

I feel frustrated that I made a quality post and it was not taken into account.
Besides, I didn't even know about this new position on the use of images.
I didn't even know what had happened before since that I've only been on Hive for 1 year.

My point is that I made a post after this decision, which I didn't even know about, and the decision was soon not to accept the post regardless of whether it had quality or not.

Do you really want me to list posts that contain youtube videos that were accepted in the curatorship initiative?

There are at least 2 posts that fit this situation.

@wolfgangsport/the-deaths-that-shocked-the-world-of-wrestling-part-2
@wolfgangsport/the-most-dangerous-racetracks-in-the-world-part-2

I know I will hurt myself more than I will gain by raising these questions but I couldn't keep quiet after feeling frustrated and seeing that other posts with content with half my words and with copyright were accepted while mine was simply rejected.

(maybe we should talk about this on discord)