I discussed with Patrick in this post about change the community control to a core team, and he said that is ok if the community agree with that.

So I had the initiative to create a proposal to see if the community wants these changes because we can have all ideas but if the community doesn't agree with them, it's not worth thinking about doing different things.

As for a response to this proposal, I would encourage the community to not vote on this funding proposal and, as written, any governance proposal that may come of it.
I don't know why any stakeholders, beyond those chosen as having a voice, would vote to remove their voice in governance to give a very small group those authorities. However, as I've stated if a governance proposal was approved then I would be willing to follow the community requests.

But looking at the latest response from @sportstalksocial account that I think that was written by @patrickulrich I would say that it seems that the opinion about the possible changes is no longer welcome.