RE: RE: The DHF Is Becoming More Transparent, But Still Has a Payroll Problem
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The DHF Is Becoming More Transparent, But Still Has a Payroll Problem

Words
154
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6M

Unfortunately, I only saw this post today, and the previous one you made 16 days ago.

More users with your courage and HIVE would become a delightful place.

I subscribe to everything you say about the lack of transparency in projects supported by the DHF.

However, I'll add another point that escapes many people (or they don't want to see).

Most of these funded projects make almost daily posts about new updates and improvements. Sometimes just to say they changed a comma in the text. Always with above-average rewards.

In other words, they are doubly funded. First with the money given by the DHF, then with multiple posts (some unnecessary).

Now, these types of posts with simple information should be for burning through or forgoing rewards.

Conclusion: they withdraw several times. They are always eating.

Is it legal? Maybe, so they receive the rewards without downvotes.

However, in my opinion, it is ethically reprehensible.