I don’t agree about centralization. In fact, I’m radically opposed to centralization. But if you mean some sort of decentralized organization, I could go along with that. And that’s what we’ve got work proposals for. Of course, one’s got to do some politicking, get a campaign going, and get support. Some key ideas that are feasible are prerequisite, but, hey, why not?
I never liked STEEM’s long term prospects due to the ninja mine, Ned, and all that whirled around both. We were always under the threat that he would do something stupid, and he finally did. As luck would have it however, it was the best thing that ever happened to the community. The community threw off a ball that was chained around its neck, and only had to change the name. Actually, it also turned out fairly profitable for most, but the main thing was not having your future mortgaged anymore. HIVE was now free to be everything that could only be dreamed about before! And even if we hadn’t had all those negatives, I don’t think they had the slightest idea about what really needed to be done either.
Those getting involved in DeFi don’t have a clue either about what they’re getting into. They’re going to learn though, the hard way. The smart money will stay put.
I’m invested in HIVE, not wHIVE, not anything else. It’s HIVE. And it’s powered up! No doubt. And I calculate I’m getting around a total ROI of 15-20% a year as well as owning a potential 1,000x. I challenge everyone to wrap their heads around that. (Note: I didn’t use ARP because only part of what we’re making is interest. 😉)
RE: Zero HIVE