Can the Steemit Inc team do better without Ned Scott involved? That's rhetorical, right? 😊

I’ve been giving this some thought after your asking. What is harm? Merriam Webster limits it primarily to physical injury or mental damage, while Cambridge includes ideas and concepts that can be harmed.

I can see how you were reminded - the influence is notable. 👍

Thanks for sharing. Looking forward to seeing the antenna!

We haven't heard from @blocktrades or any other core devs since the HF, and I imagine that's because they are up to their eyebrows with work and burning the candle at both ends. Hope they get things worked

Stone Ridge Holdings, which manages over $10 billion in assets, disclosed that it had purchased more than 10,000 BTC, worth around $114 million, as part of its treasury reserve strategy. And the beat goes

Extremely well written. I read the whole thing and was entertained as well as informed. It's a shame I've found it so late, but I'll reference if you don't mind - there's material there for several posts!

One thing I forgot to mention before is that Europe, for example, while being made up a wide mix of regulated capitalistic economic systems (thanks to the varied socialized natures of each government),

Reminds me of BEOS.

While I understand the generalized and simplified exercise you are engaging in, simplifying and generalizing at the same time can make it even more difficult, if not impossible, to reach a meaningful

Okay! Sounds good, the TAN calls that is. (Not so good that things are getting crazy where you are - that takes a lot more effort to recognize and respond to.) So, I'll give it a shot: !tan

Could be.

Some people are more comfortable being told what to do. Indeed, it's best to focus on the positive and move ahead, slowly but surely ... ... because if history has shown us anything, it's that a majority

Nicely written. I like the dry timber analogy. Almost like they wanted fewer pensioners. 🥴

Let's give it another go. !ENGAGE 50

Zero HIVE

That would be a good first target, $20 would be a good a second target, and $200 the third. 😉

I would say that they should abide by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, acting in good faith, otherwise be treated as publishers.

It's the Chinese Communist Party behind it all.