This is the most articulate, honest and objective summary I've yet read about the issues at hand. (The Minority Report analogy ... nice.)
the ultimate in censorship for it represents not just restraint on speech, but restraint on thought ... the essence of Orwell's dystopian warning in "1984."
I doubt that anything he did was illegal. The STEEM held at exchanges are effectively "in trust" and the exchanges are "trustees." But "trusts" are not "persons or things" like "people or corporations" ... they're "relationships."
For years, some of the largest bidbots on the blockchain were owned and operated by Top 20 Witnesses. Naked vote-buying and -selling, which is the dictionary definition of corruption in any voting-based system. And I recall a huge Whale trying to organize a bidbot for auctioning Witness Votes to the highest bidder. "If you want to be a Top 20 Witness, you ought to be willing to compensate Whales for their support." He even used the world "kickback."
Once Ned gave up his kingdom, naturally the barons and the oligarchs grew restless, fearing a new order, they acted to fill a perceived power vacuum.
And yet to listen to the moral outrage of the (former) Top 20 Witnesses you'd think that they were Cardinals in Conclave agonizing about who should be God's Victor on Earth. You can't be pirates on day and claim to be the navy the next.
"God, I could kill that f---ing Quill for his damned verbosity?"
RE: The Great Tron-Steem Debate - Is A Preemptive Strike Ever Justified?