RE: RE: The Great Steem-Tron Meltdown Explained
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Great Steem-Tron Meltdown Explained

cryptogee(75)
Published in
#tron
Words
86
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

Yeah, that's the point. If it was never ratified as a legal document, then legally Ned was allowed to sell Steemit with the ninja-stake attached to it, allowing the new owner to do whatever they wanted with it.

So whilst Ned may have acted like a shit, and the witnesses like cowards, as far as I can see here Justin broke no laws in the first instance. However I reckon that changed the minute he persuaded exchanges to steal people's funds for the power up.

Cg