I think it's harsh to say that they were a bit thick not to notice earlier. I watched a podcast with Joey Ingram and a guy called Domar I think. Anyway he played in the games against Postle and even made a video "Avoid Mike Postle".
He was saying that it's only when you look at everything together that it looks fishy. Anyone can run great when playing, so if you play against somebody that does once in a while you don't automatically think cheat.
Also JFK was very careful not to allow poker pros into the commentary booth after June 18th, probably because he knew they would spot something fishy.
Also it's easy to say they should have lost more. However when you know you can see every hand, it must get very difficult to play a hand honestly. But yes I agree, they were just greedy narcissists and I hope they lose all the money and more back through the lawsuit.
RE: The Curious Case Of The Poker Cheat