I assume that I have understood the content of your statement.

So that we are talking about the same things and there are no misunderstandings, let me confirm and deny a few things.

Yes, the service exchanges votes for CCD tokens.

I agree with you that “effort, quality, consumption, networking, etc.” should be a requirement. The rules for using the service are designed accordingly - and I regularly reject votes (or requests for them) if the orders/postings do not meet these requirements. I have even reported accounts to HiveWatchers on several occasions if I suspect scam or abuse behind the vote-orderers, or I actively participate in detecting them by providing information or expressing suspicions, for example. So we are both pulling in the same direction.

I don't know if you have read the rules on the page https://cryptocompany.ceo/voter.php in the “Restrictions” tab. If not, that's okay, there's a lot of information on the page. Let me show you the rules again here as a screenshot.

I am reluctant to disagree strongly, but:

... affecting others who may be deserving of votes in different forms ...

The HP behind CryptoCompany are not only used for votes within the requested service. I generally vote for nice or supportable content. So I can certainly address your concerns and warn you: “Everything is in the green zone”.

Hive doesn't benefit from this activity

I see it differently. Quite the opposite, in fact, if we're talking about regulated services that act in good faith. Yes, there are projects that attribute value to every (own) secondary account - I don't want to name names right now so as not to discredit anyone.

So it seems to me, if we clear up any misunderstandings, that we have quite similar views; I'm glad about that!

Can I answer any further questions or help you in any way?

In every case enjoy your day & make the best out of it!

(Oh, I forgot at the last answer... Sorry about...:)