The opinions in this essay are mine.
Thomas Sumner compiled information about global warming stemming from years of research that has not yet provided a precise conclusion on climate change (2016).
Clearly, in the read, climate scientists from all over the world have been recording information and have compiled a relatively informative and somewhat convincing account for the rise of global temperatures, hurricane occurrence vs frequency and the depletion of ice on the earth's extremes.
The way this paper is organized seems to be politically motivated as there is mention of a presidential campaign in the third paragraph.
Several pages into this periodical, there is mention that global warming may have been a factor to the beginning of the Syrian civil war.
Additionally, there seems to be an indirect reference to hypotheses that need to be re-worked after at least 10 years of solid research had been reviewed. There is also reference to research that has started many years earlier, however noting that our technology is just now catching up to the motivation to discover the unknown.
Review the material on your own to form your opinion. To say the organization of this article screams of a political agenda would be an understatement, but would also overshadow the importance of scientific research that may uncover results that are more far-reaching than imagined since Global Warming had been mentioned. You decide for yourself.
Let me know what you think about the whole climate debacle and what role we play in climate change as well as who to blame for the change.
Reference
Sumner, T. (16 April 2016). Vol. 189 Issue 8, p22-29. SCIENCE NEWS CHANGING CLIMATE 10 years after An Inconvenient Truth.
