RE: RE: Why Aspiring Social Media Influencers Should Start with Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Aspiring Social Media Influencers Should Start with Hive

Words
240
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
6y

Dear culgin@culgin

Interesting choice of topic. One of those posts, which surely are worth checking out and reading through.

popular the term "social media" did not exist

I wonder if term 'influencer' existed already in the past? I hardly doubts so. Right?

How successful they are can be easily measured by the number of followers/subscribers that they have.

I'm afraid you're very much wrong. That may be true 3-4 years ago, but not any more. I've been in social media industry (managing in the past several instagram and FB accounts of my clients) and my impression is that hardly anyone cares about amount of followers. Majority of users/clients are aware that real engagement only matters, since 90% of followers can be easily ... nothing but bots.

This also leads me to why I think aspiring social media influencers should start with Hive.

Here I also need to disagree. Not that I have anything against hive. However there are 3 main reasons why STEEM and HIVE are not good for new social media influencers:

  • difficult learning curve (making it easier to start with other social media)
  • lack of ads and anti-ads policy on both chains
  • terrible content discovery, which for most new users mean lack of rewards, views and engagement.

Of course it's just my own opinion. However I see that even other community leaders are stuggling with monetizing their work.

Again, solid read. Upvote on the way :)
Yours, Piotr

@crypto.piotr: Dear @culgin | Ecency