RE: RE: Artificial intelligence, low ratings and voting criteria in steemit
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Artificial intelligence, low ratings and voting criteria in steemit

Words
263
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

Dear fucho80@fucho80

I absolutely love publications related to AI. Great monday morning read :) Upvote on the way.

what is happening to us? What are our healing criteria? Does artificial intelligence exceed us?

I'm failing to understand connection between those questions and described frufflepig bot ...

I don't understand, as someone who has a voting power that can give you 0.03, decide to vote your post with 15% or 10% of their voting power, what is the point of this?

Ehm. I'm a bit confused. Let's say that you have 100K SP and your upvotes are meaningful. Would you rather upvote 10 publications only and support only 10 people, or would you rather give 10% upvotes and this way you can show your support to 100 of your followers?

Anyway, after HF21 there won't be any reason to do small upvotes any more.

There are things that artificial intelligence will never overcome and it is that feeling of empathy,

I wouldn't be so sure any more ...

Currently AI can efficiently "fake" those emotions. If AI will decide that it's time to show empathy then it will find many excellent ways to do so. I've read already publication created by software, and in this publication author was expressing his frustration with discussed topic. I could not tell that it's advanced AI.

Plus AI will be probably judging other peoples emotions way more accurate than we would. Something to thing about.

ps. did you stop promoting your publications by sending memos ? Just curious

Again, great read buddy. Have a pleasent monday
Yours, Piotr

@crypto.piotr: Dear @fucho80 | Ecency