Equity and Commodity markets are seen as more traditional and safe than many markets currently in existence. They are well regulated, liquid, and represent measurable value in either a company or a good. Major news events such as political, market, and earnings reports have the potential ability to bring about large shifts in the equity and commodity markets. Almost none of these shifts, however, is able to provide the outsized returns many investors are currently looking for and with markets at an all time high many are looking for alternatives in order to diversify their holdings.
Humans are, by nature, cyclical beings.
And while we tend to repeat the same patterns over and over again we are very bad at recognizing that we are doing so.
Italian philosopher George Santayana said it best:
”Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
The dominance of our short term memory over our long term memory gets us into trouble frequently and famously. We start wars forgetting the pain the last caused. We talk to exes thinking something will be different this time. We invest in assets that we’ve lost on before. If the most predominant human sickness were to be defined externally it would probably be our shortsightedness.
“The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” -John Maynard Keynes
While many amazing assets and utilities currently exist, and are being developed on, the blockchain there are many more that have almost no real value, current or expected. With this market currently giving outsized returns to even the average Joe Schmoe on daily basis we have to ask ourselves if the unabashed way we talk about this growth is not inherently unhealthy.
As a participant and user of many different new blockchain solutions such as steemit, storj, and etheroll to name a few I know the massive impact that cryptocurrencies can have on the world. But as I continue to see in-use protocols diminish in value and useless or non-implemented protocols increase in value due to speculation. I wonder whether we can really hope to sustain the amount of growth we’ve been seeing and whether we really want this kind of growth right now.
This post ended up being less about economics and more about market psychology than I intended. But this brings up an interesting point: Can we really separate economics from the other human sciences?
Best,
Mason