A system like this is not only confusing, it makes it impossible for newcomers to Hive to ever catch up to people who already know the game. Having an elitist system designed by Hive maximalists who have years of experience and self proclaimed good behavior dictate scores is not the direction we should be going in to make this a more inclusive platform. It provides further reason to discriminate against people and makes Hive even more of a tight knit cliche of expert users. Hive is already complicated, no need to make it even more complicated.
The main problem with Hive is the inflation, the whales and their unfair influence on the DHF. We are rewarding those who are doing nothing special and punishing everyone who has invested a penny into Hive. I have a KE ratio less than one, you want to turn me off the system because I don't have time to curate and explore new content? Because I don't spam blogs with 'that's beautiful' or because I don't live up to the reputational designs of people who have time to have meetings on the subject? Everytime I think of moving some profits made elsewhere into Hive, I read proposals to waste more money and make Hive more confusing and decide absolutely no!
RE: Hiveology: Gamification of Behaviors - Ideas about Curation Scores