I am aware that my writing is very prone to plagiarism, but I'm very determined and I don't plagiarise, except for one mistake I've made in the past. News publishing is a very difficult job if you're trying to do it without plagiarism because at the end of the day there's only one truth and the only way to tell people about it without plagiarism is to put your own ideas into it.

It is almost impossible to find plagiarism in my deep review articles that I publish on weekends because I write those articles on a single topic by examining all the sources I can find. In the articles I publish on weekdays and examine the events of that day, if I have not found something that can add my own ideas, I do not share those articles to avoid plagiarizing. Instead, I publish deep research articles just like the articles I publish on weekends.

The articles I publish during the week, in which I report on the day's events, often contain minor plagiarism, but these are usually the words of a well-known person mentioned in the news story. For example, this part of my article seems to be plagiarised because I cannot change the words that came out of that person's mouth, that would be manipulation.

Citing sources is just a big distraction if you are stealing your entire article from those sources. I have seen people in this community who plagiarised and shared all their writings from the places they cited in their sources. Many of them have now stopped publishing. However, if you think that your content is not plagiarised and you don't mind showing this to people, you can show the sources you have used. I don't hesitate to give credit to big organisations like financial times, especially when I use their charts because their infographics are great and help me explain my articles (especially the ones I share at the weekend).