Hello EVERYONE, it makes me smile that a HIVE PYRAMID MULTIACCOUNT would make a post like this, contradicting itself on many of the points described.
Unfortunately, even today I find myself witnessing so much IGNORANCE, UNFORTUNATELY!
I don't want to be arrogant or know-it-all, but DOWNVOTING, performed by multiple multiaccounts simultaneously, is an ILLEGAL practice that has a name: DOWNVOTE BOMBING!
This ILLEGAL practice is not only performed on Hive, but on other platforms as well.
OBVIOUSLY, the decentralization that many of you are PROMOTING has NEVER been visible on this platform like on others.
The creator of DPOS (DELEGATION PROOF OF STAKE) knows this well, because with this method of delegating to the WITNESSES, the latter
decide EVERYTHING about the progress of the project (I'm speaking generally, not just HIVE). I, UNLIKE ANYONE ELSE, make no distinctions and, above all, I don't get attached to projects.
Each of us should always be OBJECTIVE and, above all, maintain a CRITICAL spirit.
When independence and critical thinking, along with freedom of expression, are ATTACKED in EVERY possible and unimaginable way, then it means that we must defend only a rotten mechanism that procures ILLEGALLY created compensation, in a good 80% of cases, destroying EVERYONE and EVERYTHING, leaving standing only those who align themselves with the FICTITIOUS propaganda of those at the apex of this ROT.
It's increasingly common to see USERS writing about being subjected to SCAMS, UNREASONABLE NEGATIVE VOTES, etc.
BUT they're quickly joined by multiple accounts or shift-based PROFESSORS who, coincidentally, have consistently received positive votes.
So they have an interest in defending the FICTITIOUS system.
In many cases, they don't realize the systematic crimes being committed throughout the entire system.
Remember, Hive isn't just this; it's an incubator that generates cash flows in many areas.
All these "users" pretend not to sell and continue to support the negative vote like a mantra, even without EVER knowing the real reasons for the vote!
It would be enough to look at the history of those who receive them to see countless inconsistencies with the initiation of the lawsuits.
Perhaps there will even be accounts created on the same day to attack specific users who ask LEGAL and, above all, TECHNICAL questions. Or they offer suggestions about NOT DELEGATING to the usual multi-accounts.
The Hive problem is at its peak, and to solve it, we need to move to a different methodology, eliminating ALL the old WITNESSES.
But that's not possible, since whoever created ALL this saw fit to surround themselves with multi-accounts with HUGE delegations who act: NOT ONLY AS SABOTORS, but obviously also as self-voters, both for the WITNESS vote and for generating profits from nothing.
Now, excuse me, but dialogue is difficult when you can't engage in cross-examination and NEVER receive a response to the points and issues raised, because you ALL become professors just to defend a system that is FRAUDULENT in its methods and management, while ignoring the LEGALITY and the FRAUDULENT actions that others suffer.
So I ask you not to ALL be PROFESSORS, but use this same determination to ask INTELLIGENT questions and/or respond to the issues raised! Instead of ILLEGALLY attacking the users who raise them.
Furthermore, you talk about multi-accounts, and only you (WITNESSES) use them, largely. Controlling and subverting EVERYONE'S earnings.
Especially the IGNORANT curators.
Enjoy the show and remember to ANSWER the merits of the issues raised; otherwise, you're just CLOWNING!
Enjoy the show.

PS. Please remember that anything done to harm a user or their reputation REMAINS A CRIME (DOWNVOTE BOMBING). Using multi-accounts to mass-vote or mass-vote on your own or other users' articles for the purpose of creating FRAUDULENT value remains a crime.
Obviously, there are many other CRIMEs to discuss, but we'll see them in the future.
Don't encourage ILLEGALITY, because if you do, you'll only be an ACCOMPLICE! @condividisulweb
@condividisulweb/hive-manipulation-censorship-and-suspicious