complexring's comments on decentralized web

DiscoverWavesCommunities

complexring

@complexring

68

Resource Credits

Available

Used

Created

2016-04-10 07:31

RSS Feed

Comments

Blog Posts Comments Communities Wallet

complexring

2017-03-31 01:44

RE: 1 × 0 = 0 BUT 1 ÷ 0 is undefined - school is the rule

RE: 1 × 0 = 0 BUT 1 ÷ 0 is undefined - school is the rule

There are quite a few fundamental reasons why division by 0 is undefined. The first is to consider the graph of the function y = 1/x. If we consider the limit from the right hand side (positive real numbers)

$ 0.000

0

complexring

2017-03-17 01:05

RE: I Didn't Sign Up For This - Shutting Down My Witness And Seed Nodes

If you don't like the direction the platform is going, buy more steem and power up and join the fight. If you don't care ...

$ 0.000

0

complexring

2017-03-13 01:48

RE: 1 × 0 = 0 BUT 1 ÷ 0 is undefined - school is the rule

I fail to see what is wrong with what she claims to have been taught. 1 / 0 is indeed undefined. What else would it be?

complexring

2017-03-13 01:03

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

... Might is simply reality.

complexring

2017-03-13 00:58

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

No. Im saying the law applies because the government has the power to enforce it. I brought this up earlier ... are you agreeing with the old adage that "might makes right"? Edit: forgot the

complexring

2017-03-12 21:01

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

I mean, if youre looking for legal argumentation that jurisdiction is a thing, its right there in the constitution. So ... the State has jurisdiction because the constitution says that the State has power?

complexring

2017-03-12 04:59

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

No, im saying that whether or not the law applies to a specific circumstance or person can only be established with legal argumentation. Not with evidence. You might not think this is the way it ought

complexring

2017-03-12 04:29

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

So i could cite laws and court decisions, but that would just be more law (which you don't think applies). You can cite laws, if you want, and I would say that a citation of a law is a legal opinion, and

complexring

2017-03-12 03:07

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

Or is your point that no law applies to anyone? because 'prove it'. Maybe it is. Because if it is, thats an interesting theory. And a great way to end up in prison if you ever use it in your own defense.

complexring

2017-03-12 03:03

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

It isn't a fact at all, which is why i used quotes around the word 'fact'. OK, sure. but if i ask you the same question about demonstrating the applicability of a law, there is no way to prove or disprove

complexring

2017-03-12 02:35

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

not in the US. Or any jurisdiction ive ever heard of. I have to ask... what kind of 'evidence' could there ever be to establish the 'fact' that a law, any law, was applicable to a person or circumstance.

complexring

2017-03-12 02:17

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

How is applicability of the law a matter of law? Applicability, whether or not exists, is a matter of fact.

complexring

2017-03-12 02:07

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

The question is getting at an essential element of the charge, i.e. applicability of the law or statute. How can someone be said to violate a code if the code does not apply? As such, it is essential to

complexring

2017-03-12 01:49

RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof

Provide the evidence that proves the claim that these laws are applicable.

complexring

2017-03-08 14:18

RE: Whales upvoting chosen accounts crap for the rewards is one thing, attacking the rewards of a genuinely productive account is utter madness

I like how you used the opportunity to respond to my questions. /end sarcasm

complexring

2017-03-08 04:52

RE: Qtum - UTXO based POS Smart Contract Platform | Crowdsale March 16, 2017 @ 12PM GMT - Whitepaper

Patrick or Stephen Dai, or whomever he is, scammed the BitBay. Only 51% to investors. Smart money is not buying this (unless you're a part of the BobSurplus crew).

complexring

2017-03-08 04:49

RE: Why I Believe The King James Bible Version Is The Preserved Word Of God (Youtube Link)

Martin Luther removed whole books of the Bible because they didn't jive with his viewpoint.

complexring

2017-03-08 02:30

RE: Whales upvoting chosen accounts crap for the rewards is one thing, attacking the rewards of a genuinely productive account is utter madness

I hardly think that paying for AWS or any other servers or amassing the technical skills necessary to mine (in whatever way that is possible) comes at no cost ... In fact, it's quite risky as there is

complexring

2017-02-24 01:44

RE: Bad Whales Flagging Content with False, Irrational and Hypocritical Excuses

Subjective value is precisely that.

complexring

2017-02-20 15:00

RE: A Chat With A Top Steem Trader…….. Steemians Speak - Has Steemit Met Your Expectation?....... This Week On Steemit…….. SteemMag – Steemit’s Weekend Digest #25 p.2

Due to nested comment limitations, putting this here. I don't use other people's created tools for indicators. Yes, we're still on lower volume, but the supply availability on the order books is not available