Thank you for your response. I feel validated in my sense that your work is computer-generated text, not human writing. As you say

I sometimes use digital tools ...these tools serve to refine my expression ... (emphasis mine)

Ninety percent of writing is the refinement of expression for clarity and beauty. If you are using a digital tool to refine, than you aren't writing it, a computer is.

You go on to say, about your article "Hike in Normandy"

each anecdote and analysis reflects my experiences and thoughts. When I express these thoughts, they are my words, my lived experience

I don't doubt that this is your lived experience and your feeling about the village you hiked through. But your words? No, not if you are using a digital tool to express your experience and feeling. (And the factual information you present, the dates and so on, should be documented.)

With regard to your interpretation of my poem, you say that you

always strive to bring a personal perspective, a product of my understanding and my feelings towards the text. My analysis may seem thorough, but it is rooted in my personal experience and my desire to understand the deep meaning of the words.

You never deny that you used AI to interpret my work! Just because you agree with or understand what the AI says about the symbolism, doesn't mean that it is your analysis or your personal perspective.