The negative enforcement thing was more about the idea of extending the sale (the other proposal). I think it's very problematic if we don't respect the deadlines we set. For example, if I say "you have 9 months to buy Conclave Arcana and then it's gone" and you say "well I'll just hold off until they eventually extend the sale" we create a situation where we start cyclically pushing back and extending every sale because "maybe a buyer will come" and the unfortunate reality is that we may just need some people having regret to have any value of sales in the future. While I'd prefer these sold and we don't see another land card set this year... I'm just saying practically speaking if these packs are burned and there's demand for more land cards due to... I dunno buildings releasing and whatever they produce being desirable... then we'll probably just end up with another new set of cards and probably more confusion/feelings.

In short, don't really think there's a clear win here, but it'll work out however it works out and I'm sure we'll adapt accordingly. Not super worried about either outcome personally.