We've been pretty spotty with treasurer coverage since this started. Previously we voted to expand it to 14 treasurers and added 3 new treasurers at that time. It seemed like people were fine with that. Currently I'm just trying to help us be able to more efficiently execute proposals and find substitutes for the treasurers that didn't express an interest in continuing.

Ideally, I would prefer if we could build out on-chain treasurer voting similar to how we do for validators. We (the DAO) don't really have a lot of funds to add features to the validator network at the moment and the dev that built it is also busy with other projects. We've had some awesome community members do upgrades in the past, so maybe we can eventually find someone that has the time and skillset to build out a new treasurer voting feature.

If the DAO doesn't want to accept this proposal, that's fine, but we should definitely come up with another viable way to elect treasurers and preferably soon if this proposal fails. We've had multiple instances of bridge liquidity being delayed for multiple days and sometimes people are just busy with life or move on. Hopefully this provides some greater insight into where this proposal is coming from, if there's any other questions raised that you want answered feel free to ask.