My dedicated account 
the proofofbrain.io site has currently stabilized just above Alexa's 300k position, there is a settling phase, probably due to the latest events on the distribution of votes by some whales, which have sparked an internal debate in the community and that seems to have been partially resolved.
The initial problem of any project is the distribution and inflation of money: generally in the first period the issue of money is more and more abundant, and gradually decreases over time. This abundance is split among a few users and potentially creates a major problem of potential market manipulation. POB follows a Bitcoin-like issuance with a halving every 4 years (Halving) and that means a lot of POB in circulation at least in these years.
The distribution will find its balance in the future, especially if the project has the ability to attract the attention of users and stimulate them to purchase the token. I was pondering in this regard whether reverse inflation could have offered different results: low emission in the first years, so that the few users cannot stock it up, and a constant increase over time with the entry of an increasingly numerous audience (not there is a guarantee that it will happen if the project does not attract the attention of the markets). Or would a reduced initial and final distribution be more equitable and more abundant in its central phase?
My hypotheses are personal arguments that I continue to believe useless if there is no honesty, seriousness and desire to grow at the basis of the project. The bullish and bearish moments are destined to alternate but if the focus is clear, then it will be easier not to get lost during the journey!
Thanks for reading my post!