Lately, I have been trying to figure out why my posts haven't been appearing in STEMGEEKS.net despite using the #STEM tag appropriately.
It turns out according to the latest post found below that particular tags have been muted: @stemgeeks/stemgeeks-now-indexes-and-can-reward-more-than-just-stem-tag
Of one of these was the muting of the 'dlike' tag. The others were 'share2steem', 'actifit', and 'steemhunt'.
Honestly, I'm a bit torn at the selective muting of these tags, as it would seem that there is plenty of room to make posts relevant.
For example, one that surprisingly fit the 'actifit' tag but still seemed relevant to STEM was a recent post from 
Unfortunately, this post was filtered out and not able to be rewarded. Too bad given how out of the way the author actually went to make it work. By and large I do support the muting of the 'actifit' tag however given the degree of difficulty in making it relevant.
Yet likewise, it would not be difficult to imagine the thousands of on-topic, STEM-related posts that could be generated using the 'dlike' tag. If this platform is truly out to curate high quality content relative to the STEM topic, it will be at times difficult to necessarily find it via an audience fixated solely on gaining rewards and who was dumb enough to jump into crypto head-on. More often than not, the truly brighter content may lie in already published materials that others could elaborate on far more insightfully than our crowd.
That said, this is the direction that 
Whereas I might be more concerned that this platform may not reach a suitable volume of high-quality content without time-saving reference capabilities such as the 'dlike' platform, I do respect his attempt to safeguard the community from perceived thoughtless filtration.
We'll see what kind of momentum STEMGEEKS is capable of sustaining, but for now I am a strong investing supporter of its potential, and feel somewhat emboldened to have a concerned leader such as
