Christianity states that god is three in one, which is god the father, Jesus the son and the Holy spirit.
So, what I think is that why do the scriptures and holy books or chirstian teachings only states god is omni-benevolent, omni-scient and omni-potent, why only three? And why not add something such as omnidocent or omni-relational, etc.. .
Well you can say that it is because those three describes everything and doesn't need other words but omni-potent alone completely is nessceary to describe it.
So unless those three, father, son and holy spirit each posses one power yet still are the one.
So I believe omni-benevolence is true and the paradox might be easier to solve.
Disclaimer : This is just my theory that I developed while trying to solve the omni-benevolence paradox, this is not false chirstain doctrine or teaching. This is merely a theory and please accept it or share it at your own risk. And if this theory had been developed way before mine, I give all credits to that person.
My other theory is the omni thingy in the bible seems a bit sketchy to me. When he is already omniscient wouldn't that include omnipotence already? As more I think about the bibles omni absolutes as more I find them to be interconnected and indeed to be the same thing.
The only thing that matters under the absolutes is the one with benevolence imho. Only one that "can" apply to people in practice. Nobody can know it all, can do it all, but there is no limit to compassion. Power, and knowledge are both rather fragile without love. Love doesn't need power and knowledge but power and knowledge need love (compassion) or else they have no terracore function in reality.
When I now take omnibenevolence and compare it to Father, Son, and holy spirit Vs. the spiritual clean version of Parent, Child, Spirit I find a load of authority induced instead of the holy trinity of creation
e.q I think the bible has been written/altered by something that's not ultimately/absolute pro-life .
