I didn't say you invented the news, but if you go to the link I provided you will see a word for word copy and paste of information. That is plagiarism. It is not a witch hunt it is pointing out theft.

Here is quoted text from your article:

Paramount Pictures has decided that the film will return to theaters in a limited way, with a new look. With a restoration in Dolby Vision, that is, 4K quality. A restoration that has been supervised at all times by Coppola. For this restoration, more than 300 boxes of film reels were carefully examined, in order to find the best possible resolution for each frame of each of the tapes. More than 4,000 hours were required to repair stains, tears, and other anomalies on the negatives. In addition, 1,000 hours were used to perform rigorous color correction, which ensured that the high dynamic range tools respected the original vision of Coppola and director of photography Gordon Willis

Here is quoted text from the article I linked:

Over 300 cartons of film were scrutinized to find the best possible resolution for every frame of all three films.
Over 4,000 hours were spent repairing film stains, tears, and other anomalies in the negatives.
Over 1,000 hours were spent on rigorous color correction to ensure the high dynamic range tools were respectful of the original vision of Coppola and cinematographer Gordon Willis.
In addition to the 5.1 audio approved by Walter Murch in 2007, the original mono tracks on he Godfather and The Godfather: Part II have been restored.
All work was overseen by Coppola.

The article I linked was written Jan. 13, 2022 by John Trent and as you are not John Trent and wrote your article after Jan. 13, 2022 it is plagiarism.

Nothing prevents you from using statistics provided by Paramount but you can't copy and paste material into your article. That is theft and plagiarism. Additionally, if you use material from press releases, it needs to be sources as well as the images you use.

I hope my quoted examples help you out.