If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. ~ Emma Goldman
If we look at today's system of government with its laws and orders will realise that whatever doesn't serve the governments of any country is in most cases either regulated or banned and made illegal.
Whatever can make some change to the current system is always at the whim of the world leaders. There are a lot of things that are being made illegal or seen as the enemy of government today like bitcoin which is changing the financial power of each citizen to become as rich and powerful financially as the government itself.
Bitcoins are seen as an enemy because it is a catalyst for change in the system. Same with other unlawful and illegal substances that may exist right now.
Right now it's becoming more and more important for politicians to think bitcoin about their stance on Bitcoin before the Bitcoiner and voters can decide who they wish to vote for. We could not have imagined a world like that before. But now it's something voters are considering before voting.
However, talking about if voting can even still change anything is something we all have our opinions on which in reality as we all know doesn't matter. It's very much possible that any government today find Bitcoin attractive at first but after. Being elected starts something that possibly would hinder the growth of cryptocurrency in the process.
The voting system we have today is corrupt and we all know why having someone who is a Bitcoiner or trying to use a Bitcoin card would find it hard to even get a change of being a runner-up. The us election is coming and it's no news that the voters are considering a Bitcoin maxi candidate but let's face it no matter if a candidate is pro btc he'll still not be able to make the best decisions for Bitcoiners because the system that the political system is built on itself can't function at its peak because of technology like btc.
Whats do you think about having a bitcoiner as a head of a state. Share your thoughts in the comments.
