The fallacy here appears to be that people think the virus can be stopped or contained. That was never the purpose of the lockdowns. We have bought time and shown that the medical capacity is up to speed on dealing with a dangerous pandemic. The secondary effects of the lockdown may be far worse than the direct effects of the virus. Let's keep protecting the vulnerable. But let's get back to work.
RE: Swedish epidemiologist Dr. Giesecke says: "Lockdowns are ineffective"