The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.
If you allow your governments to break he law in an 'emergency', then what's to stop them creating emergencies to break the law?
The protocol for the PCR test, given by the WHO and the CDC, was knowingly ignored, and PCR machines have been set to a level that guarantees 100% false positives.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases/”infections” recorded through the misuse of this test.
So there is no pandemic – this is all about getting people to take the shot.
The team lead by Dr Fuellmich’s argument is; at the very least, we’re being subjected to an illegal experiment, and at the worst, global genocide.
Dr Fuellmich points out that the jab is in clear violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes, which carries the penalty of death for those who violate them;
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.”
By definition, a vaccine must; provide immunity to the virus, protect recipients from getting the virus, reduce deaths, infections, circulation, and transmission of the virus – we are told the experimental jab does none of these, yet they fraudulently call it a vaccine.
As far as duress, restraint and coercion – it’s everywhere. We are constantly being told; If you want your life back – get the shot.
“The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.”
The most fruitful method would be a healthy immune system, which can be achieved through good health, and natural supplements, such as Vitamin D, Vitamin C, and Zinc, but the people are not being told this, in fact, those that point it out are being vilified and silenced.
“The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.”
This experimental jab skipped animal testing. There has been plenty of animal testing, but they ALL die shortly after, hence the reason to pretend to skip it for emergency reasons..
“The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.”
According to official reports, as of 12/June there are already milions of deaths, and well over 100 million injuries from this experiment. It’s estimated that only a small fraction are reported.
“No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.”
Past trials have shown a strong possibility that these new spike proteins would cause the body to attack itself. This is known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).
In addition, a Nobel prize winning virologist says the vaccine is creating the variants.
“The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.”
The alleged C19 has a 98% survival rate – less deadly than the seasonal flu. By mid-2021, the experimental jab had already become the most dangerous vaccine in VAERS 30+ year history.
“Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.”
There were no preparations made. There are no facilities. The subject just shows up for their shot, and goes home.
“The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.”
This experiment has been exclusively run by politicians, the media, celebrities, and big pharma bureaucrats.
“During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.”
Thousands of medical experts have attempted to end this madness, and their voices continue to be silenced.
“During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”
The experiment must be brought to end if resulting in injury and death, and yet the experiment pushes on.
Once again; those that violate these specific international laws are subject to the death penalty.
This is likely the biggest crime ever committed against the world population, and the question is; do we still have a judicial system to exact justice?
