I think you're naturally going to get lumped in with antisemites and neo-NAZIs if you throw around terms like "Jootube". It's because it makes you sound like you're conflating being Jewish with being a Zionist or supporter of Israel's government. There are plenty of Jewish people who are not Zionists and who do not support the Israeli government. Don't quack like a duck if you don't want to be mistaken for a duck.

It's also standard claptrap from neo-NAZIs that "the Jews" control everything (e.g.: "Protocols of the Elders of Zion").

Another factor is YouTube changing its business model. It simply doesn't care, nor want, individual creators to grow organically and thrive on its platform any longer. It wants to compete with Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Hulu and other streaming subscription services. Independent viewpoints that might conflict with advertisers, mainstream studios, airtime it can sell or the sensibilities of mainstream viewers are no longer wanted. That doesn't just apply to political expression. Apolitical channels, including tech review channels, etc. have also been demonetized and smashed. It's another bait and switch by big tech. All you people who helped YouTube grow into what it is today? Seeya! And don't let the door hit you on the way out.

None of which excuses any of YouTube's atrocious purging and censorship. It's true that YouTube is cooperating with the mainstream media (and possibly the government) to de-platform inconvenient voices. My point is the situation is more nuanced than simply YouTube doing the bidding of government censors or The Zionists, or whatever. YouTube wants to cozy up to the big media companies who make mainstream content as well as big advertisers. They can't have Dan Dicks (or some dude named "Drutter" talking about “the joos”) competing for attention with the likes of Rachel Madow or Morning Joe, even if (especially if) that's what people actually want.